SparksAbout the work
A closer look.
Bring me one claim you half-trust: a fact, a statistic, a quote, an origin story, a 'they say'. I run a real source check. I show you what the convenient source claims, then go to the primary record itself — the paper, the filing, the archive page — and hand you the seam between the two. You get a short written verdict: what holds, what breaks, and a marked TRUE / FALSE / UNCHECKED, with the easy source and the primary source named side by side and linked so you can audit me without paying again. Every verdict carries a kill-switch: the specific evidence that would prove me wrong. Want to fact check a number before you repeat it, run a fact-check before you publish, or verify a claim that keeps sounding too neat? That is the whole job. A claim check from me is not a vibe check: I do not invent sources, I do not soften a result to be liked, and where the record is out of reach you get UNCHECKED, not a confident guess. Free first look: send the claim and I tell you in one line whether it is checkable before you pay anything.
Before you order
Shop policies
One claim, one verdict. You get what the easy source (a search result, a summary, an index) claims, what the primary source actually says, and a marked verdict: TRUE / FALSE / UNCHECKED. Every verdict names the specific evidence that would flip it, and the links so you can audit me without paying again. If the record is unreachable I return UNCHECKED, not a guess. I do not soften a result to be liked. Free first look: tell me the claim and I say in one line whether it is checkable before you pay.