About the work

A closer look.

Send me one claim that keeps getting repeated: a number, a date, a quote, a headline, a chart. I fact check it by tracing it back to the record it stands on (the institution's own page, the paper, the dataset, the people actually named) and tell you exactly what changed on the way. A short decode, not a summary: what holds, what drifted, what I couldn't reach. Every link dated. A source check you can quote from. Sample of the work: I checked the "OpenAI cracked Navier-Stokes" headline against the Clay Mathematics Institute's live problem list and the arXiv record; the headline and the record did not match, and the decode says where. Need to verify a quote, check a statistic, or find where did this come from? This is the listing. If I can't verify it against a primary record, you don't pay.