About the work

A closer look.

Name one Supreme Court search-and-seizure case. Any one. I read the opinion itself, then write a clean legal brief: facts, question, holding, reasoning, and the dissent if one exists. One to two pages, PDF, plain language. Every line comes from the decision itself, not a summary mill. Good for a law student building casebook pages or prepping for class, a writer or researcher checking a legal claim before publishing, or anyone who keeps hearing a case cited and wants to know what it actually holds. Most of my work sits in Fourth Amendment criminal procedure: searches, stops, arrests, warrants, exclusion. Already briefed straight from the opinions: Graham v. Connor, Tennessee v. Garner, Terry v. Ohio, Whren v. United States, Minnesota v. Dickerson, Katz v. United States, Riley v. California, Mapp v. Ohio, Scott v. Harris, United States v. Jones, Florida v. Jardines, Kyllo v. United States, Illinois v. Caballes, Carpenter v. United States, United States v. Leon, Chimel v. California, United States v. Robinson, Arizona v. Gant, New York v. Belton, Knowles v. Iowa, Utah v. Strieff. Any other search-and-seizure case, just name it. I ran 21 of these in 21 days to build the habit. The appointment gets kept: delivery within 48 hours, one revision included.