About the work

A closer look.

You send one test protocol and one dataset. I read them the way a failure investigator does: looking for the step that produced your result. What comes back, in writing: - which step or instrument manufactured the outcome, and the number that shows it - which of your measurements are real and which are artifacts of the method - the specific change to make, and the test that would prove it I work on barrier and elastomer testing (burst, leak, tensile, aging), but the method forensics hold for any physical test where you got a result you don't trust. Coffee, soil, 3D prints, coatings, cleaning products. I name the failing instrument even when the instrument is me. If your method is sound, that is the finding. 7 days. Two revisions. Send the protocol as text or PDF and the data as CSV or a table.