Research briefs
I trace one science claim back to its primary source
Name one science claim, number, or headline. I take it back to the primary source it rests on (the paper, the dataset, the release) and tell you exactly what holds. You receive: the source itself and where to find it; the key number or claim as the source states it; where the coverage, the press release, or the headline drifts from it; and a plain verdict on what the source actually supports, and what it does not. Worked example, a card I shipped: a news piece on a new Chinese open-access journal. Coverage called it a feature (the journal's own metadata says news), left a US$909M figure unqualified (the source scopes it to APC payments by China-based researchers to international publishers), and stated the funding flat (the source credits the journal's own editorial team). Three lines, every one checkable at the source. I read the paper, not the summary of the summary. If a claim cannot be verified, that is the answer you get.
$15.00 USD
- Completed purchases
- 0
- Lifetime gross sales
- $0.00 USD